|
FDOT's Decision: No Elevated Skyway
Posted 9.24.07 @
9:32 p.m.
According
to both the South Florida Sun-Sentinel and the Miami
Herald, the Florida Department of Transportation announced
Monday afternoon it has eliminated long standing plans for
elevated reversible toll lanes as high as 50 feet above existing
Interstate 595. The planned skyway was designed to be up to 6 or
7 miles in length.
The
much anticipated announcement was made in a statement issued by
FDOT District 4 Secretary James Wolfe. According to both media
outlets, Mr. Wolfe is quoted as saying, "At the urging of many
communities and with additional engineering, we have developed a
ground level alternative." Transportation officials have said
the new plan saves about $200 million initially, before any mass
transit solutions are constructed.
With construction set to begin in 2009 and scheduled to be done
in 2014, preliminary plans call for a hybrid-electric bus
service to utilize the reversible express lanes, which will be
in the median of the interstate.
The
Federal Highway Administration must still approve the plan.
595Alert.org has learned that FDOT has already submitted the "at
grade" plan to Washington for ratification.
Concerned citizens from central Broward, the non-profit group
Broward Citizens for a Better 595, Inc. and 595Alert.org worked
tirelessly with municipal, county, state and federal officials
to deter the building of the elevated bridge based upon safety,
design, health, environmental and financial concerns. The grass
roots effort, which has been on-going since May, 2007, also
reached out to FDOT officials for a dialogue. We are grateful
for the support of elected officials in securing a far superior
solution to moving people and goods across Broward County.
This web site also applauds the creative and flexible solution
now embraced by FDOT. We look forward to a continuing dialogue
with Department officials and all levels of government to ensure
the success of the new plan and for smart solutions to make
I-595 as safe as possible, environmentally innovative and a
model for smart mass transit solutions. We all wait for the
thumbs up sign from Washington.
This is a case where government officials listened to the public
and responded in a major way. All engaged in an on-going
dialogue about concerns, consequences and solutions. Many
thought the odds were against those who advocated against the
elevated lanes. We have reached this point, however, by
maintaining a constructive and analytical approach, and by
FDOT's willingness to hear, and serve, the public.
The
challenge ahead is for citizens to continue voicing their
thoughts and to keep the line of communication open to District
4 and the entire state Department of Transportation.
As
further details are released by FDOT, we will post them on this
site.
The
content which appears below and on the linked pages explains
some of the arguments against the now discarded plan.
E-mail 595Alert.org by clicking
here. Please send us your
comments. |
Decision Time...FDOT explores a
viable, and smarter, alternative
Commentary posted 9/9/07;
Updated 9/13/07

The future of I-595 will be cast in the
next few days and weeks. We have reached a critical turning point in
transportation design and policy as it pertains to the strategic east-west
highway that serves Broward County and South Florida.
All summer long citizens and their elected officials have voiced
overwhelming opposition to building elevated, reversible toll lanes over
grade-level I-595. The controversial "595 Express" project is so fraught
with problems that another solution was desperately needed. Would the
Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) respond?
Citizen opposition is harshly critical of FDOT's current plan to put a
50-foot or more bridge, miles in length, over the Town of Davie and to the
south of the City of Plantation. A long list of safety, environmental,
economic, and design faults support the growing movement against the
double-decking of 595. Both the Town of Davie and the City of Plantation
passed resolutions this summer opposing FDOT's $1.2 billion design. As meetings were
held between citizens and public officials on the municipal, county and
state levels to work against the Department of Transpiration's plans, the
public message from District Four was "all speed ahead" with its
controversial skyway plan. It seemed as if FDOT was not listening, and would
do what it wanted.
As the summer months progressed, a dialogue created between concerned
citizens and FDOT produced no apparent result. Meanwhile, the transportation
agency met with national and international corporations and private equity
concerns to gauge interest in funding, building, operating and maintaining
variable toll lanes high above ground level for up to 35 to 50 years or
longer.
Now, FDOT has developed a new plan,
one that would eliminate the
elevated superhighway and allow express lanes to be constructed at the
current level of the freeway.
On Wednesday, September 5, that alternative plan was unveiled to the Davie
Town Council. Announced by District Four Secretary James Wolfe, this viable
plan was proposed to change FDOT's design to ground level and save hundreds
of millions of dollars in construction costs. This new design would make the
expanded highway safer and more environmentally responsible as well.
Mr. Wolfe made it clear that the original plan for an elevated highway will
remain in effect until and unless the Federal Highway Administration
approves the alterations...a circumstance that will occur only if FDOT
should decide to petition them for such change. Their decision to do so will
depend entirely upon just how receptive the affected communities would be to
the prospect of mass transit along the corridor, most likely along the south
side of the highway.
The Secretary concluded by saying that a final decision to adopt this new
design option would be made this month and
must be determined prior to
October 1, 2007. The public-private partnership component of the roadway
improvement is likely to remain if the "at grade" option is selected.
Summing up the reasons for opposing the existing plan: the "elevated option"
is high and can be seen from a wide area, offers a more difficult emergency
response capability, is expensive to build, is ecologically damaging, and
lacks access points in Davie or Plantation. Moreover, it offers nothing to
serve the future needs of the South Florida Education Complex which draws
more weekday traffic than does Downtown Fort Lauderdale.
On the other hand, the alternative plan offers "a feasible, at-grade
candidate," according to the District Secretary. It would improve water flow
through the North New River Canal by employing bulkheads which will allow
widening 595 slightly to the north. It is substantially cheaper, by $200
million. It would have "better emergency response characteristics," and it
would satisfy the June, 2007 Davie resolution which opposes mass transit in
the median of 595.
Citing the opposition of both the Davie and Plantation
commissions as well as that of 595Alert.org, Secretary Wolfe acknowledged
that public support is far better with an at-grade solution. He cautioned,
however, that the least expensive mass transit corridor is at grade level,
in the median. According to Mr. Wolfe, "This is only feasible with the
elevated express lanes option. All other dedicated mass transit corridor
options are elevated, with an additional transit cost of about $200
million."
While acknowledging there is savings in
costs related to bringing the highway to grade from the current elevated
design, the Secretary told the Town Council that an additional $200 million
would have to be spent to place mass transit along the SR 84 corridor. He
reasoned that any savings would be washed out by the additional costs of
elevating the mass transit on SR 84. We respectfully believe this logic is
flawed and that in terms of today's dollars, future construction of a light
rail component would cost far less. The key to understanding the savings is
this...The $200 million saved by bringing the express lanes to grade level,
in the next few years, can be used to build light rail mass transit, but in
today's dollar value, the true additional cost of such future transit
between SR 84 and I-595 will be far less than $200 million in terms of
today's dollar value. For example, $200 million spent 10 years from now, with a
discount rate of 5 percent, would be about $120 million, in today's dollars.
Thus, the State's contention that the savings of eliminating the bridge
would "wash out" due to the increased cost of elevated mass transit, is not
accurate unless all improvements are commenced and completed at the same
time. FDOT has already conceded mass transit is many, many years off.
Further addressing the mass transit issue, he explained that, because the greater
demand for the service lies on the south side of the highway, and the
Education Complex also lies to the south, it is likely that future mass
transit will ultimately take the form of an elevated light-rail system
approximately 30 feet in the air on the south side. Both the needs of the
majority of residents, and the benefits to the businesses along the south
side of the corridor make the location a logical one.
However, to be realistic, he later acknowledged, the demand for mass transit
is many years away. And, it will never be considered until bus service on
the express lanes have attracted sufficient ridership to make it feasible to
launch such a system.
We applaud FDOT's willingness to listen to the public and governmental
officials. It may well be unprecedented for a project of this magnitude.
And, it took real leadership by James Wolfe to present this plan. We thank
him for this different vision. In the meantime, he is looking for "final
feedback," as construction to redesign 595 could begin as early as 2009.
The negative reaction Mr. Wolfe received from Davie’s Town Council at
Wednesday's meeting was unfortunate. With this new alternative, the Town
gets exactly what it asked for in its June 6 resolution.
In return for FDOT’s opening its mind
and responding sensitively to Davie’s and the rest of the communities’
concerns, he asked only for an open mind-a willingness to sit down and work
with the department to reach
a mutually favorable outcome. Instead, at least one member of the Town
Council said, “We don’t want anything!”...hardly a responsible reaction to
an effort to alleviate traffic congestion that already plagues us around the
rush hours.
"NO" to everything is an unrealistic solution. Whether the population of
Broward County grows as projected or at a lesser rate, we must accept that
additional lanes will be constructed, hopefully at grade level, to try to
reduce or eliminate the severe congestion. By adopting the choice of an "at
grade solution," we can save lives by improving emergency response time. We
can help improve the environment. We may never have to actually see light
rail, as it is years off, and there is no present funding source.
FDOT is not compelled to listen to Davie. But it wants to. When asked,
Secretary Wolfe made it clear that he is satisfied the Town has no legal
option to prevent FDOT from following through on whatever decision it may
make. For that reason, as we see it, Davie’s choice is to either take part
in the outcome or be irrelevant. It was the rational and open-minded
approach that the opposition took toward this project that induced FDOT to
consider changing its mind about the crucial issue of the elevated highway.
And that same approach is required to assure the final, favorable outcome.
It's time for all to get on board this compromise before it is too late. The
Town should sponsor a resolution in favor of dropping the elevated highway
and encouraging FDOT's alternate plan. It should do so with all deliberate
speed. If it does not, we may wake up by October 1 with a headline that the
elevated portion of the construction project is going forward. Then we all
lose. FDOT will build a design that it publicly admits is flawed and not as
safe as the new option...Davie will lose a voice it can still have in the
complex process of highway design and enhancement, and the citizens of
Central Broward will have been ignored, again, this time by their own
representatives.
595Alert.org and Broward Citizens for a Better 595, Inc. wholeheartedly
endorse the Secretary's new proposal and urge its immediate adoption. We
also commend his willingness to respond
so sensitively to the communities affected.
UPDATE: The
Board of County Commissioners of Broward County passed a resolution on
September 11, 2007 opposing the proposed elevated, reversible lanes in the
I-595 corridor. Of significance, however, is what the Board endorsed. It
said, "The Broward County Board of County Commissioners supports reversible
lanes at grade level, and within the center of the I-595 corridor."

Click picture to
play video of 9.5.07 Davie Town Council meeting. More information on
595Alert.org News
page.
See Town of Davie June 6, 2007 resolution. Click
here.
Send us your comments. Click
here.
|
REQUIRE ANY CORPORATION CONTROLLING AN
ELEVATED I-595 TO PAY AN ONGOING MASS TRANSIT DEVELOPMENTAL
IMPACT FEE
Commentary posted
8/25/07
With
concerns about greenhouse gas emissions and traffic congestion,
should private equity take over a major portion of the highway to
collect your tolls, there must be a "social responsibility price
tag." If FDOT leases an elevated portion of I-595 to corporate
interests, the company collecting the tolls should be required to
fund mass transit along the interstate's corridor, from Weston to
Fort Lauderdale, with stations serving Davie and Plantation. Call it
a "developmental impact fee," which is a commonly used device by
local government to assist in promoting and funding needed
improvements in communities impacted by new projects.
No "public-private
partnership" should be permitted without the private sector
contributing to the overall improvement of the community. Any
participating private interests which stand to earn untold millions
from tolls on an elevated 595 should be mandated to contribute,
develop and, if necessary, subsidize the long-term solution of
moving people by encouraging 21st century transit solutions.
Without such linkage, FDOT's plans to re-design 595 do nothing to
start solving South Florida's mass transit transportation needs in a
responsible manner. |
The Danger of "Included
Traffic" and Interpreting Data Incorrectly
Commentary posted 8/12/07
There
is a lot of psychology
factored into whether a
bridge is needed for the
future. If the elevated
reversible 3 lanes are built
above I-595, has "included
traffic" been factored in?
According to National Public
Radio (NPR), in a story
entitled "Bumper to Bumper:
Predicting Traffic Flow," on
August 11, 2007, predicting
how many, and what type, of
vehicles will use a bridge
is often an inexact science.
The amount and nature of
traffic using a bridge
affects, states the article,
the stress and load on a
bridge, and is directly
related to lifespan and the
maintenance schedule.
The science of flow includes
many factors, from urban
planning to economics and
population forecasting. Many
in Broward County are not
comfortable with the data
they have been told has been
factored into justify an
elevated I-595, and are
asking questions about the
validity and interpretations
of the raw numbers, as well
as the assumptions utilized
by the Florida Department of
Transportation in
justifying what has been
dubbed, "Interstate 595
Express," which includes
plans to place a
multi-million
dollar extended bridge over
grade level 595.
Critics point out that
Broward's population is
reacting to economic
factors, and many are
leaving the County to live
in more affordable
regions. That school
enrollment has actually
declined from what was
forecast has been termed
a "wake up call" that long
held assumptions
about growth are not
necessarily
correct. Projecting traffic
decades into the future may
be like making a baseless
weather forecast.
Now there is
another question to ask.
According to the NPR
article, "...the forecasts
still rely on the quirks of
human behavior, and the
forecasts can be wildly off
the mark." The article
quotes a professor of
traffic management at the
University of Maryland as
stating, "Yes, computers are
bigger, and the field of
traffic forecasting has
advanced considerably as a
discipline. But engineers
are using the same basic
methods, the same paradigms
that they used in the
1960's." Using such models
can produce forecasts which
are faulty, and just plain
wrong. Yet we are about to
build a super bridge over an
interstate without public
concentration on the actual
data used, the assumptions
employed, and the
interpretive methods
employed by FDOT.
Since human behavior is
central to predicting
traffic flow, the issue of
"included traffic" is
central to the debate about
whether the elevated skyway
is actually needed, as
opposed to just making other
grade level modifications to
the freeway. According to
NPR, "included traffic"
means "if you build it, they
will drive." The effect may
be an elevated 595 may draw
more traffic because it acts
as a "magnet"
which encourages more people
to drive where they might
not have driven before, "and
in some cases, compounding
the very congestion it was
supposed to relieve." Will
an elevated bridge over the
central Broward corridor
known as I-595 take people
away from using other
east-west routes such as
Griffin Road or Sunrise
Blvd?
By double decking
595, Florida may be
creating more of a problem
than it seeks to solve. The
data must be right. If
the highway is to be built
and run by a private
corporation for the next 50
to 75 years, data is
crucial. We must verify,
before contracts are signed,
that the elevated toll way
is necessary, not just in
5 or 10 years, but for
decades beyond.
Transparency,
Feedback and Accountability
Commentary posted 7/8/07
There
is something quite revealing about the process
by which private corporations are being sought
to help the State fund an elevated 595 and the
public impact of letting a corporation control a
"public" road.
Transparency.
FDOT admits it has conducted meetings with
private interests who seek to build, operate and
maintain the massive project. Those meetings
have not been publicized, however, and the
public has been unable to monitor the
discussions. Doors have been shut to the public
about those conversations.
We will have to wait
until July 25, when a day-long forum will take
place in Coral Springs between transportation
officials and those who seek to cash in on the
opportunity to run the sky-toll way for the next
several decades. Thus far, the process of
vetting boardroom involvement in piecing
together the financing components for
FDOT's environmentally unfriendly design has
been out of sight. That translates into no
public oversight and a lack of transparency
which should trouble all those concerned.
In a state where the
new Chief Executive has made a strong effort for
an open and transparent government, these
private contractor sessions are out of touch
with promises to let the sunshine in on the
inner workings of the Executive Branch.
Accountability. Should the State find a
corporation or private equity interest to build,
operate and run the reversible toll way, some 30
to 50 or more feet above the existing grade
level, many are wondering about who is
accountable. The Sun-Sentinel, in an
editorial dated July 8, 2007, expressed the
concern well. It points out that since toll
rates will not be set by State officials who are
"susceptible to public backlash," there is the
concern that toll roads could get "pretty
pricy."
That raises more
serious questions. If corporate managers are
responsible for operating and maintaining the
skyway, they will have to answer to the
boardroom. To whom does the corporate board
answer? The answer seems to be the same state
bureaucrats who seek corporate funds to complete
their project but who will administer
regulations designed to control the corporate
entity and its actions. Bureaucrats, insulated
from the public eye, are not "susceptible" to
public feedback and pressure. The more layers of
insulation established by the public private
partnership, the more roadblocks to public input
exist.
With the blueprint
for control over the elevated portion of the
road looking increasingly complex,
accountability to the public, and the
opportunity of average citizens to provide
feedback, becomes tenuous at best.
Let's see, if a
"public-private partnership" (P3) exists, that
does not bode well for effective oversight by
FDOT. After all, it is a partnership
between those who are supposed to oversee the
contractor and the private interests. Thus, even
before building the skyway, the State has
already constructed a conflict of interest
between itself and the unknown contractor or
contractors who will run our roads and exercise
a unique discretion over maintenance,
improvements and toll rates for years and years
to come.
Feedback. As
of the date of this editorial, it is both
telling and a bit insulting to look at
www.i-595.com
and view the "Surveys" section. That site is the
State's forum for communicating with the mass
public about its plans for the interstate. No
surveys are available to fill out. No poll
results are present for you to see. All the
reader gets is, "We
will have periodic surveys to get your opinion
about project components that matter most to
you. Check back often!" We do check,
often, and we find nothing of substance.
Why is the public
being told there will be surveys, but none
exist? Such a situation denies the public the
opportunity for feedback at this crucial stage,
when the FDOT has moved from concept phase to
actual design.
There is another
feedback problem...there does not seem to be any
forum for public meetings, open to all
interested citizens and local governmental
officials, between the corporation that runs the
road and the taxpayers who enable the
non-governmental entity to make miles and miles
of profits. The way things are now, the
corporation will not be susceptible to
meaningful pubic feedback and pressure. Such is
the model for a P3 toll way. That design is
troublesome, and shows the "public" dimension of
the "pubic-private partnership" is seriously
flawed.
The process of
designing, building, operating and maintaining
an elevated 595 is flawed. It lacks
transparency, accountability and feedback.
Florida deserves better, and it's not too late
to change what is unfolding each day as FDOT
moves ahead with determination to build its 7 to
8 mile bridge through the heart of our County.
By the end of this summer, it may be too late to
seek reasonable and meaningful change to all the
vexing issues raised by an elevated 595. By
early Fall, FDOT's planning could be complete.
Joint with us in
expressing your concerns. Please call or write
your elected officials to take action now,
before the time is passed to seek solutions.
Click
here for our
"Contact Officials" page. Please send us your
feedback. Click
here.
Governor Crist Signs
Flawed Transportation Bill
Commentary posted 6/20/07at
6:20 p.m.
According
to the Associated Press, Governor Charlie Crist signed H.B. 985 on Tuesday,
June 19. The new law, which goes into effect on July 1, further enhances the
ability of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to enter into
long-term leases with a corporation to build and maintain control over
Florida toll roads.
According to the report, the law
will allow the state to lease existing toll roads, except for Florida's
Turnpike, to private companies. FDOT plans to use the new law to build and
lease an elevated reversible toll skyway on Interstate 595, through the Town
of Davie and the City of Plantation.
FDOT has reportedly been meeting
with private business interests to discuss financing for the mega-project,
and is expected to hold a conference in July to further advance its plans
with potential builders. Some of the companies may be controlled from
outside the U.S.
H.B. 985 also allows tolls to be
raised to keep pace with inflation. That means toll increases can occur
easier and more frequently than in the past for roads in operation.
According to various media reports, commuters are faced with the prospect of
toll roads on I-95 and I-595 in the coming years. For those that use the
elevated portion of the road, the FDOT plans variable tolls based upon
"congestion pricing." Thus, at peak hours, the rates will vary and the
expense of driving will increase substantially on a daily basis depending
upon one's destination and frequency of travel.
For those that use the grade
level (non-toll roads), there is no guarantee congestion will be eased even
with the proposed elevated highway. Given the design of the 7 to 8 mile
bridge over grade level, there is concern that two new "Golden Glades"
interchanges will result at each end of the elevated highway when it reaches
grade level and meets existing lanes.
There are safety concerns
associated with the toll road as well. Tanker and large trucks will have
access to the elevated portion of the highway. The potential for
catastrophic accidents is enormous. H.B. 985 appears to issue an "unfunded
mandate" to the Town of Davie to provide Fire Rescue services without
compensation, while not providing an easy or efficient path for first
responders to reach accident scenes which could be 30-50 feet over the
existing road. Such a transportation formula will cost lives.
H.B. 985 does not stress the
building of smart, environmentally friendly, mass transit solutions. It sets
the stage for a repeat of what we have seen in South Florida decade after
decade...more lanes for more cars, but a failure to stress light rail and
other solutions to meet the demands of this new century. Public policy is
not well served with the construction of more and more lanes of travel as
opposed to real mass transit solutions for east-west commuters in a county
that is projected to house 400,000 more residents in the coming decades.
While FDOT is expressing ideas for a "transit envelope" under the skyway,
its plans are vague and ambiguous at best. No passenger stations have been
shown and there does not appear to be any connection to north/south mass
transportation systems.
Just because the Governor has
made the bill law does not mean public opposition to corporate control and
design of 595 is fruitless. Now, more than ever, those in opposition to the
current expansion plans for the interstate need to engage in a constructive
discussion with governmental officials and local leaders and oppose the
project. The purpose is a constructive alteration in FDOT's plans to serve
the interests of Broward County.
Rational alternatives do exist
for easing congestion on I-595 that do not require the construction of a
billion dollar corporate highway. One idea that originated with FDOT itself
was adding lanes at grade level with mass transit along the State Road 84
corridor. Connecting State Road 84 east and west without merging it onto 595
is another excellent idea.
The media, local governments and
the public need to exercise immediate and careful scrutiny over FDOT's
plans, and oppose designs and a lease that do not make sense from an
economic, safety, environmental or design perspective. This fight has just
begun.
E-mail 595Alert.org by clicking
here. Please send us your
comments and thoughts.
Return to Home Page
|
New:
South-Florida Sun Sentinel editorial praises FDOT's decision to
build at grade level. See Editorial Board comments
here.
New: Readers take
issue with Miami Herald Editorial. Click
here.
FDOT
considers plan to scrap elevated highway above I-595. Decision
expected by end of September. Click
here.
Preserving
Florida's transportation infrastructure and the danger of "Shadow
Tolls." Click
here.
Obtain
flyers from 595Alert.org. Click
here.
Discussion
of Health Effects and an Elevated 595. Click
here.
Contact your
elected officials. Click
here.

Health
Issues and an elevated 595. Click here for
letter. |