Editorials and Analysis

Return to Home Page

 

FDOT's Decision: No Elevated Skyway

Posted 9.24.07 @ 9:32 p.m.

According to both the South Florida Sun-Sentinel and the Miami Herald, the Florida Department of Transportation announced Monday afternoon it has eliminated long standing plans for elevated reversible toll lanes as high as 50 feet above existing Interstate 595. The planned skyway was designed to be up to 6 or 7 miles in length.

The much anticipated announcement was made in a statement issued by FDOT District 4 Secretary James Wolfe. According to both media outlets, Mr. Wolfe is quoted as saying, "At the urging of many communities and with additional engineering, we have developed a ground level alternative." Transportation officials have said the new plan saves about $200 million initially, before any mass transit solutions are constructed.

With construction set to begin in 2009 and scheduled to be done in 2014, preliminary plans call for a hybrid-electric bus service to utilize the reversible express lanes, which will be in the median of the interstate.

The Federal Highway Administration must still approve the plan. 595Alert.org has learned that FDOT has already submitted the "at grade" plan to Washington for ratification.

Concerned citizens from central Broward, the non-profit group Broward Citizens for a Better 595, Inc. and 595Alert.org worked tirelessly with municipal, county, state and federal officials to deter the building of the elevated bridge based upon safety, design, health, environmental and financial concerns. The grass roots effort, which has been on-going since May, 2007, also reached out to FDOT officials for a dialogue. We are grateful for the support of elected officials in securing a far superior solution to moving people and goods across Broward County.

This web site also applauds the creative and flexible solution now embraced by FDOT. We look forward to a continuing dialogue with Department officials and all levels of government to ensure the success of the new plan and for smart solutions to make I-595 as safe as possible, environmentally innovative and a model for smart mass transit solutions. We all wait for the thumbs up sign from Washington.

This is a case where government officials listened to the public and responded in a major way. All engaged in an on-going dialogue about concerns, consequences and solutions. Many thought the odds were against those who advocated against the elevated lanes. We have reached this point, however, by maintaining a constructive and analytical approach, and by FDOT's willingness to hear, and serve, the public.

The challenge ahead is for citizens to continue voicing their thoughts and to keep the line of communication open to District 4 and the entire state Department of Transportation.

As further details are released by FDOT, we will post them on this site.

The content which appears below and on the linked pages explains some of the arguments against the now discarded plan.

E-mail 595Alert.org by clicking here. Please send us your comments.

Decision Time...FDOT explores a viable, and smarter, alternative

Commentary posted 9/9/07; Updated 9/13/07

The future of I-595 will be cast in the next few days and weeks. We have reached a critical turning point in transportation design and policy as it pertains to the strategic east-west highway that serves Broward County and South Florida. 
 
All summer long citizens and their elected officials have voiced overwhelming opposition to building elevated, reversible toll lanes over grade-level I-595. The controversial "595 Express" project is so fraught with problems that another solution was desperately needed. Would the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) respond?
 
Citizen opposition is harshly critical of FDOT's current plan to put a 50-foot or more bridge, miles in length, over the Town of Davie and to the south of the City of Plantation. A long list of safety, environmental, economic, and design faults support the growing movement against the double-decking of 595. Both the Town of Davie and the City of Plantation passed resolutions this summer opposing FDOT's $1.2 billion design. As meetings were held between citizens and public officials on the municipal, county and state levels to work against the Department of Transpiration's plans, the public message from District Four was "all speed ahead" with its controversial skyway plan. It seemed as if FDOT was not listening, and would do what it wanted.
 
As the summer months progressed, a dialogue created between concerned citizens and FDOT produced no apparent result. Meanwhile, the transportation agency met with national and international corporations and private equity concerns to gauge interest in funding, building, operating and maintaining variable toll lanes high above ground level for up to 35 to 50 years or longer. 
 
Now, FDOT has developed a new plan, one that would eliminate the elevated superhighway and allow express lanes to be constructed at the current level of the freeway.
 
On Wednesday, September 5, that alternative plan was unveiled to the Davie Town Council. Announced by District Four Secretary James Wolfe, this viable plan was proposed to change FDOT's design to ground level and save hundreds of millions of dollars in construction costs. This new design would make the expanded highway safer and more environmentally responsible as well.
 
Mr. Wolfe made it clear that the original plan for an elevated highway will remain in effect until and unless the Federal Highway Administration approves the alterations...a circumstance that will occur only if FDOT should decide to petition them for such change. Their decision to do so will depend entirely upon just how receptive the affected communities would be to the prospect of mass transit along the corridor, most likely along the south side of the highway.
 
The Secretary concluded by saying that a final decision to adopt this new design option would be made this month and must be determined prior to October 1, 2007. The public-private partnership component of the roadway improvement is likely to remain if the "at grade" option is selected.
 
Summing up the reasons for opposing the existing plan: the "elevated option" is high and can be seen from a wide area, offers a more difficult emergency response capability, is expensive to build, is ecologically damaging, and lacks access points in Davie or Plantation. Moreover, it offers nothing to serve the future needs of the South Florida Education Complex which draws more weekday traffic than does Downtown Fort Lauderdale.
 
On the other hand, the alternative plan offers "a feasible, at-grade candidate," according to the District Secretary. It would improve water flow through the North New River Canal by employing bulkheads which will allow widening 595 slightly to the north. It is substantially cheaper, by $200 million. It would have "better emergency response characteristics," and it would satisfy the June, 2007 Davie resolution which opposes mass transit in the median of 595.

Citing the opposition of both the Davie and Plantation commissions as well as that of 595Alert.org, Secretary Wolfe acknowledged that public support is far better with an at-grade solution. He cautioned, however, that the least expensive mass transit corridor is at grade level, in the median. According to Mr. Wolfe, "This is only feasible with the elevated express lanes option. All other dedicated mass transit corridor options are elevated, with an additional transit cost of about $200 million." 

While acknowledging there is savings in costs related to bringing the highway to grade from the current elevated design, the Secretary told the Town Council that an additional $200 million would have to be spent to place mass transit along the SR 84 corridor. He reasoned that any savings would be washed out by the additional costs of elevating the mass transit on SR 84. We respectfully believe this logic is flawed and that in terms of today's dollars, future construction of a light rail component would cost far less. The key to understanding the savings is this...The $200 million saved by bringing the express lanes to grade level, in the next few years, can be used to build light rail mass transit, but in today's dollar value, the true additional cost of such future transit between SR 84 and I-595 will be far less than $200 million in terms of today's dollar value. For example, $200 million spent 10 years from now, with a discount rate of 5 percent, would be about $120 million, in today's dollars. Thus, the State's contention that the savings of eliminating the bridge would "wash out" due to the increased cost of elevated mass transit, is not accurate unless all improvements are commenced and completed at the same time. FDOT has already conceded mass transit is many, many years off.

Further addressing the mass transit issue, he explained that, because the greater demand for the service lies on the south side of the highway, and the Education Complex also lies to the south, it is likely that future mass transit will ultimately take the form of an elevated light-rail system approximately 30 feet in the air on the south side. Both the needs of the majority of residents, and the benefits to the businesses along the south side of the corridor make the location a logical one.
 
However, to be realistic, he later acknowledged, the demand for mass transit is many years away. And, it will never be considered until bus service on the express lanes have attracted sufficient ridership to make it feasible to launch such a system.
 
We applaud FDOT's willingness to listen to the public and governmental officials. It may well be unprecedented for a project of this magnitude. And, it took real leadership by James Wolfe to present this plan. We thank him for this different vision. In the meantime, he is looking for "final feedback," as construction to redesign 595 could begin as early as 2009.
 
The negative reaction Mr. Wolfe received from Davie’s Town Council at Wednesday's meeting was unfortunate. With this new alternative, the Town gets exactly what it asked for in its June 6 resolution.

In return for FDOT’s opening its mind and responding sensitively to Davie’s and the rest of the communities’ concerns, he asked only for an open mind­-a willingness to sit down and work with the department to reach a mutually favorable outcome. Instead, at least one member of the Town Council said, “We don’t want anything!”...hardly a responsible reaction to an effort to alleviate traffic congestion that already plagues us around the rush hours.
 
"NO" to everything is an unrealistic solution. Whether the population of Broward County grows as projected or at a lesser rate, we must accept that additional lanes will be constructed, hopefully at grade level, to try to reduce or eliminate the severe congestion. By adopting the choice of an "at grade solution," we can save lives by improving emergency response time. We can help improve the environment. We may never have to actually see light rail, as it is years off, and there is no present funding source.
 
FDOT is not compelled to listen to Davie. But it wants to. When asked, Secretary Wolfe made it clear that he is satisfied the Town has no legal option to prevent FDOT from following through on whatever decision it may make. For that reason, as we see it, Davie’s choice is to either take part in the outcome or be irrelevant. It was the rational and open-minded approach that the opposition took toward this project that induced FDOT to consider changing its mind about the crucial issue of the elevated highway. And that same approach is required to assure the final, favorable outcome.
 
It's time for all to get on board this compromise before it is too late. The Town should sponsor a resolution in favor of dropping the elevated highway and encouraging FDOT's alternate plan. It should do so with all deliberate speed. If it does not, we may wake up by October 1 with a headline that the elevated portion of the construction project is going forward. Then we all lose. FDOT will build a design that it publicly admits is flawed and not as safe as the new option...Davie will lose a voice it can still have in the complex process of highway design and enhancement, and the citizens of Central Broward will have been ignored, again, this time by their own representatives.
 
595Alert.org and Broward Citizens for a Better 595, Inc. wholeheartedly endorse the Secretary's new proposal and urge its immediate adoption. We also commend his willingness to respond so sensitively to the communities affected.

UPDATE: The Board of County Commissioners of Broward County passed a resolution on September 11, 2007 opposing the proposed elevated, reversible lanes in the I-595 corridor. Of significance, however, is what the Board endorsed. It said, "The Broward County Board of County Commissioners supports reversible lanes at grade level, and within the center of the I-595 corridor."

 Click picture to play video of 9.5.07 Davie Town Council meeting. More information on 595Alert.org News page.

See Town of Davie June 6, 2007 resolution. Click here.

Send us your comments. Click here.

 

REQUIRE ANY CORPORATION CONTROLLING AN ELEVATED I-595 TO PAY AN ONGOING  MASS TRANSIT DEVELOPMENTAL IMPACT FEE

Commentary posted 8/25/07

With concerns about greenhouse gas emissions and traffic congestion, should private equity take over a major portion of the highway to collect your tolls, there must be a "social responsibility price tag." If FDOT leases an elevated portion of I-595 to corporate interests, the company collecting the tolls should be required to fund mass transit along the interstate's corridor, from Weston to Fort Lauderdale, with stations serving Davie and Plantation. Call it a "developmental impact fee," which is a commonly used device by local government to assist in promoting and funding needed improvements in communities impacted by new  projects.

No "public-private partnership" should be permitted without the private sector contributing to the overall improvement of the community. Any participating private interests which stand to earn untold millions from tolls on an elevated 595 should be mandated to contribute, develop and, if necessary, subsidize the long-term solution of moving people by encouraging 21st century transit solutions.  Without such linkage, FDOT's plans to re-design 595 do nothing to start solving South Florida's mass transit transportation needs in a responsible manner.

The Danger of "Included Traffic" and Interpreting Data Incorrectly

Commentary posted 8/12/07

There is a lot of psychology factored into whether a bridge is needed for the future. If the elevated reversible 3 lanes are built above I-595, has "included traffic" been factored in?

According to National Public Radio (NPR), in a story entitled "Bumper to Bumper: Predicting Traffic Flow," on August 11, 2007, predicting how many, and what type, of vehicles will use a bridge is often an inexact science. The amount and nature of traffic using a bridge affects, states the article, the stress and load on a bridge, and is directly related to lifespan and the maintenance schedule.

The science of flow includes many factors, from urban planning to economics and population forecasting. Many in Broward County are not comfortable with the data they have been told has been factored into justify an elevated I-595, and are asking questions about the validity and interpretations of the raw numbers, as well as the assumptions utilized by the Florida Department of Transportation in justifying what has been dubbed, "Interstate 595 Express," which includes plans to place a multi-million dollar extended bridge over grade level 595. 

Critics point out that Broward's population is reacting to economic factors, and many are leaving the County to live in more affordable regions. That school enrollment has actually declined from what was forecast has been termed a "wake up call" that long held assumptions about growth are not necessarily correct. Projecting traffic decades into the future may be like making a baseless weather forecast.

Now there is another question to ask. According to the NPR article, "...the forecasts still rely on the quirks of human behavior, and the forecasts can be wildly off the mark." The article quotes a professor of traffic management at the University of Maryland as stating, "Yes, computers are bigger, and the field of traffic forecasting has advanced considerably as a discipline. But engineers are using the same basic methods, the same paradigms that they used in the 1960's." Using such models can produce forecasts which are faulty, and just plain wrong. Yet we are about to build a super bridge over an interstate without public concentration on the actual data used, the assumptions employed, and the interpretive methods employed by FDOT.

Since human behavior is central to predicting traffic flow, the issue of "included traffic" is central to the debate about whether the elevated skyway is actually needed, as opposed to just making other grade level modifications to the freeway. According to NPR, "included traffic" means "if you build it, they will drive." The effect may be an elevated 595 may draw more traffic because it acts as a "magnet" which encourages more people to drive where they might not have driven before, "and in some cases, compounding the very congestion it was supposed to relieve." Will an elevated bridge over the central Broward corridor known as I-595 take people away from using other east-west routes such as Griffin Road or Sunrise Blvd?

By double decking 595, Florida may be creating more of a problem than it seeks to solve. The data must be right. If the highway is to be built and run by a private corporation for the next 50 to 75 years,  data is crucial. We must verify, before contracts are signed, that the elevated toll way is necessary, not just in 5 or 10 years, but for decades beyond. 

 

Transparency, Feedback and Accountability

Commentary posted 7/8/07

There is something quite revealing about the process by which private corporations are being sought to help the State fund an elevated 595 and the public impact of letting a corporation control a "public" road.
 
Transparency. FDOT admits it has conducted meetings with private interests who seek to build, operate and maintain the massive project. Those meetings have not been publicized, however, and the public has been unable to monitor the discussions. Doors have been shut to the public about those conversations.

We will have to wait until July 25, when a day-long forum will take place in Coral Springs between transportation officials and those who seek to cash in on the opportunity to run the sky-toll way for the next several decades. Thus far, the process of vetting boardroom involvement in piecing together the financing components for FDOT's environmentally unfriendly design has been out of sight. That translates into no public oversight and a lack of transparency which should trouble all those concerned.

In a state where the new Chief Executive has made a strong effort for an open and transparent government, these private contractor sessions are out of touch with promises to let the sunshine in on the inner workings of the Executive Branch.

 
Accountability. Should the State find a corporation or private equity interest to build, operate and run the reversible toll way, some 30 to 50 or more feet above the existing grade level, many are wondering about who is accountable. The Sun-Sentinel, in an editorial dated July 8, 2007, expressed the concern well. It points out that since toll rates will not be set by State officials who are "susceptible to public backlash," there is the concern that toll roads could get "pretty pricy."
 
That raises more serious questions. If corporate managers are responsible for operating and maintaining the skyway, they will have to answer to the boardroom. To whom does the corporate board answer? The answer seems to be the same state bureaucrats who seek corporate funds to complete their project but who will administer regulations designed to control the corporate entity and its actions. Bureaucrats, insulated from the public eye, are not "susceptible" to public feedback and pressure. The more layers of insulation established by the public private partnership, the more roadblocks to public input exist.

With the blueprint for control over the elevated portion of the road looking increasingly complex, accountability to the public, and the opportunity of average citizens to provide feedback, becomes tenuous at best.

Let's see, if a "public-private partnership" (P3) exists, that does not bode well for effective oversight by FDOT. After all, it is a partnership between those who are supposed to oversee the contractor and the private interests. Thus, even before building the skyway, the State has already constructed a conflict of interest between itself and the unknown contractor or contractors who will run our roads and exercise a unique discretion over maintenance, improvements and toll rates for years and years to come.

 
Feedback. As of the date of this editorial, it is both telling and a bit insulting to look at www.i-595.com and view the "Surveys" section. That site is the State's forum for communicating with the mass public about its plans for the interstate. No surveys are available to fill out. No poll results are present for you to see. All the reader gets is, "We will have periodic surveys to get your opinion about project components that matter most to you.  Check back often!"  We do check, often, and we find nothing of substance.
 
Why is the public being told there will be surveys, but none exist? Such a situation denies the public the opportunity for feedback at this crucial stage, when the FDOT has moved from concept phase to actual design.
 
There is another feedback problem...there does not seem to be any forum for public meetings, open to all interested citizens and local governmental officials, between the corporation that runs the road and the taxpayers who enable the non-governmental entity to make miles and miles of profits. The way things are now, the corporation will not be susceptible to meaningful pubic feedback and pressure. Such is the model for a P3 toll way. That design is troublesome, and shows the "public" dimension of the "pubic-private partnership" is seriously flawed.
 
The process of designing, building, operating and maintaining an elevated 595 is flawed. It lacks transparency, accountability and feedback. Florida deserves better, and it's not too late to change what is unfolding each day as FDOT moves ahead with determination to build its 7 to 8 mile bridge through the heart of our County. By the end of this summer, it may be too late to seek reasonable and meaningful change to all the vexing issues raised by an elevated 595. By early Fall, FDOT's planning could be complete.

Joint with us in expressing your concerns. Please call or write your elected officials to take action now, before the time is passed to seek solutions. Click here for our "Contact Officials" page. Please send us your feedback. Click here.

 

Governor Crist Signs Flawed Transportation Bill

Commentary posted 6/20/07at 6:20 p.m.

According to the Associated Press, Governor Charlie Crist signed H.B. 985 on Tuesday, June 19. The new law, which goes into effect on July 1, further enhances the ability of the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to enter into long-term leases with a corporation to build and maintain control over Florida toll roads. 

According to the report, the law will allow the state to lease existing toll roads, except for Florida's Turnpike, to private companies. FDOT plans to use the new law to build and lease an elevated reversible toll skyway on Interstate 595, through the Town of Davie and the City of Plantation.

FDOT has reportedly been meeting with private business interests to discuss financing for the mega-project, and is expected to hold a conference in July to further advance its plans with potential builders. Some of the companies may be controlled from outside the U.S.

H.B. 985 also allows tolls to be raised to keep pace with inflation. That means toll increases can occur easier and more frequently than in the past for roads in operation. According to various media reports, commuters are faced with the prospect of toll roads on I-95 and I-595 in the coming years. For those that use the elevated portion of the road, the FDOT plans variable tolls based upon "congestion pricing." Thus, at peak hours, the rates will vary and the expense of driving will increase substantially on a daily basis depending upon one's destination and frequency of travel.

For those that use the grade level (non-toll roads), there is no guarantee congestion will be eased even with the proposed elevated highway. Given the design of the 7 to 8 mile bridge over grade level, there is concern that two new "Golden Glades" interchanges will result at each end of the elevated highway when it reaches grade level and meets existing lanes.

There are safety concerns associated with the toll road as well. Tanker and large trucks will have access to the elevated portion of the highway. The potential for catastrophic accidents is enormous. H.B. 985 appears to issue an "unfunded mandate" to the Town of Davie to provide Fire Rescue services without compensation, while not providing an easy or efficient path for first responders to reach accident scenes which could be 30-50 feet over the existing road. Such a transportation formula will cost lives.

H.B. 985 does not stress the building of smart, environmentally friendly, mass transit solutions. It sets the stage for a repeat of what we have seen in South Florida decade after decade...more lanes for more cars, but a failure to stress light rail and other solutions to meet the demands of this new century. Public policy is not well served with the construction of more and more lanes of travel as opposed to real mass transit solutions for east-west commuters in a county that is projected to house 400,000 more residents in the coming decades. While FDOT is expressing ideas for a "transit envelope" under the skyway, its plans are vague and ambiguous at best. No passenger stations have been shown and there does not appear to be any connection to north/south mass transportation systems.

Just because the Governor has made the bill law does not mean public opposition to corporate control and design of 595 is fruitless. Now, more than ever, those in opposition to the current expansion plans for the interstate need to engage in a constructive discussion with governmental officials and local leaders and oppose the project. The purpose is a constructive alteration in FDOT's plans to serve the interests of Broward County.

Rational alternatives do exist for easing congestion on I-595 that do not require the construction of a billion dollar corporate highway. One idea that originated with FDOT itself was adding lanes at grade level with mass transit along the State Road 84 corridor. Connecting State Road 84 east and west without merging it onto 595 is another excellent idea.

The media, local governments and the public need to exercise immediate and careful scrutiny over FDOT's plans, and oppose designs and a lease that do not make sense from an economic, safety, environmental or design perspective. This fight has just begun.

E-mail 595Alert.org by clicking here. Please send us your comments and thoughts.

Return to Home Page

 

New: South-Florida Sun Sentinel editorial praises FDOT's decision to build at grade level. See Editorial Board comments here.

New: Readers take issue with Miami Herald Editorial. Click here.

FDOT considers plan to scrap elevated highway above I-595. Decision expected by end of September. Click here.

Preserving Florida's transportation infrastructure and the danger of "Shadow Tolls." Click here.

Obtain flyers from 595Alert.org. Click here.

Discussion of Health Effects and an Elevated 595. Click here.

Contact your elected officials. Click here.

Health Issues and an elevated 595. Click here for letter. 

© Copyright 2007, Broward Citizens For A Better 595, Inc., a non-profit corporation. No claim to governmental works.

Mitchell A. Chester, Website Editor
Website Template Designed by InterWeb Designs, Inc.